Having a very hard time. I try and blame the heat. But it is more than hot house temperatures. It is a disjointed landscape of pain.

Thoughts turn once again to self-destruction. To abandon this hopeless world of inequity. The continual struggle which achieves nothing. To watch the well connected prey on those unable to defend themselves.

It could be the heat. The heat has held steady in the high 80’s for all of the week. The nights have been ovens. No respite and little sleep. There has been no opportunity for the body to recover. The brief moments spent in an air conditioned store are like minutes borrowed from heaven.

The period from April to August 5th 2015, was spent in a nose to the grindstone effort. Effort that came close to the level of exertion required to crank out the first insurance appeal in the period November 2012 to early January 2013. But it did not surpass that previous struggle.

It is impossible to maintain such a level of effort. My entire life becomes consumed in the completion of a single task. This activity was, I think, of value. It provided understanding and insight into the actions of a 3rd party and demonstrated how such actions had an effect on me. The activity was like a jig-saw puzzle intellectual challenge. Here are 1,000 pieces. Assemble them! They must all fit together in one single, unified, comprehensive, image.

The last of the puzzle pieces did not fall into place until July 25th, 2015. The document derived from the completed puzzle was not submitted until August 5th, 2015. And then I was bushwhacked by a mean little man, an individual who has broken the law multiple times and seeks to obtain some sort of “win” from his lawbreaking.

This is what I am fighting against:

7. That the respondent has demonstrated a history of abuse of process in these matters before the Tribunal adminstratif du Québec.

7.1 That such abuse of process does include the introduction of evidence that serves only to defame the applicant and serves no other probative purpose other than defamation. That such defamation is contrary to the provisions of the CIVIL CODE OF QUÉBEC in respect to BOOK ONE, TITLE ONE, Enjoyment and Exercise of Civil Rights Clause 3: Every person is the holder of personality rights, such as the right to life, the right to the inviolability and integrity of his person, and the right to the respect of his name, reputation and privacy.
These rights are inalienable.
1991, c. 64, a. 3.

7.2 That such abuse of process does include the introduction of evidence which is manifestly false.

7.3 That such abuse of process does include the preservation of evidence despite being served notice that such evidence is manifestly false, or defamatory.

7.4 That such abuse of process does include a failure to respond to a demand for production of evidence in discovery.

7.5 That such abuse of process does include interference with a witness and acting so as to obstruct justice in the collection of evidence which is material to the applicant and the successful prosecution of his case.

7.6 That such abuse of process does include the alleged criminal publication of a Defamatory Libel in violation of the Criminal Code of Canada Section 299, R.S., c. C-34, s. 263.

7.7 That such abuse of process does include Derogatory Acts against the profession of avocat as defined in Section 4.02.01. (c) and (e) of chapter B-1, r. 3 Code of ethics of advocates, An Act respecting the Barreau du Québec (chapter B-1, s. 4) Professional Code (chapter C-26, s. 87).