2.40    Should le Ministre wish to confirm my statement in regard to the irrelevance of MRI to my injury he may wish to consult with any of the following: Claude Lepage, Marc-Étienne Rousseau, Lindsay B. Lewis, and Alan C. Evans. All are associated with the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), McGill University, Montreal, Canada. All are co-authors of a recent paper published in Science 21, June 2013, Vol. 340 no. 6139 pp 1472-1475. Any one of these individuals will be able to attest to the fact that the form of MRI utilized by Dr. X is incapable of resolving any neurologic structure of less that 1 mm in dimension and that axonal injury is well below this 1 mm threshold and typically requires resolution in the 20 to 30 micron range. The diagnostic imagery ordered by Dr  X is ten orders of magnitude below the required resolution threshold.
Continue reading →

2.20    By virtue of entering this phrase I shall have protected myself from any legal sanction, redress, or remedy, that you may seek to impose. I suggest to le Ministre that it is not in his interests, my interests, nor in the interests of any citizen of Québec, that the Collège des médecins du Québec be permitted to erect its own alternate legal jurisdiction.
Continue reading →

Section II

2.1   On June 10th 2013, I requested Dr. X to provide me with a full copy of my medical file. The documents which compose this file are contained in Exhibit C Item 1 through Item 18. This section is based on the evidence provided by these documents.

2.2   On the first page of Exhibit C Item 1, Dr X makes the notification: “N.B. : Today is not a medico-legal expertise (sic).”
Continue reading →